Whose Alignment? Comparing LLM Process Alignment Across Diverse Organizational Decision Contexts
Citations
0
Open access
No
Source
arxiv
OpenAlex
Not enriched
arXiv
2605.25256
Abstract
Steerable pluralism requires a model to faithfully represent one specified perspective. Organizations are a natural setting for this demand, since they deploy LLMs to make decisions that must reflect their own policy. Yet, most existing work fixes that perspective at the level of individuals or demographic groups. We rely on a decision-policy capturing method to measure process alignment in organizational settings, assessing whether an LLM faithfully reproduces the organization's decision policy rather than merely reaching the same conclusions. We find heterogeneity along two axes. Across models, baseline alignment varies strongly and tracks neither pricing nor general benchmark performance. Across organizations, the structure of alignment changes. In ECHR Article 6 decisions, process alignment predicts output accuracy ($r = 0.85$, $p < .001$), and making the organization's past decision policy explicit improves poorly aligned models. In consumer credit decisions, process alignment is low overall but varies more than output accuracy, and the models resist adopting the organization's weighting of protected attributes. Because historical credit decisions encode potentially discriminatory patterns, higher alignment there is not always desirable. Process-level measurement is therefore necessary, and depending on whether the target policy is normatively desirable, the same procedure can calibrate or audit a model. Deciding which policy to align to, and whether higher alignment is feasible or desirable, makes organizational alignment a pluralistic problem in its own right.
Collections
Add to collection
Paper intelligence
Analysis has not been completed yet.
No graph connections yet.
Sync citations or add papers to shared collections to build this network.
Knowledge graph
Citation network
Explore references, papers that cite this work and related papers in your Codex library.
References
0No references have been linked yet.
Cited by
0No saved paper is currently linked as citing this work.
Related papers
0Add papers to shared collections or enrich their topics to find related work.
Research workspace
Attach the paper PDF, extract its text, classify its contents and create semantic embeddings.
Paper resources
No PDF assets have been attached to this paper yet.