AI Safety: Necessary, but insufficient and possibly problematic
Citations
0
Open access
No
Source
arxiv
OpenAlex
Not enriched
DOI
10.1007/s00146-024-01899-y
arXiv
2403.17419
Abstract
This article critically examines the recent hype around AI safety. We first start with noting the nature of the AI safety hype as being dominated by governments and corporations, and contrast it with other avenues within AI research on advancing social good. We consider what 'AI safety' actually means, and outline the dominant concepts that the digital footprint of AI safety aligns with. We posit that AI safety has a nuanced and uneasy relationship with transparency and other allied notions associated with societal good, indicating that it is an insufficient notion if the goal is that of societal good in a broad sense. We note that the AI safety debate has already influenced some regulatory efforts in AI, perhaps in not so desirable directions. We also share our concerns on how AI safety may normalize AI that advances structural harm through providing exploitative and harmful AI with a veneer of safety.
Collections
Add to collection
Paper intelligence
Analysis has not been completed yet.
No graph connections yet.
Sync citations or add papers to shared collections to build this network.
Knowledge graph
Citation network
Explore references, papers that cite this work and related papers in your Codex library.
References
0No references have been linked yet.
Cited by
0No saved paper is currently linked as citing this work.
Related papers
0Add papers to shared collections or enrich their topics to find related work.
Research workspace
Attach the paper PDF, extract its text, classify its contents and create semantic embeddings.
Paper resources
No PDF assets have been attached to this paper yet.