Competing Visions of Ethical AI: A Case Study of OpenAI
Citations
0
Open access
No
Source
arxiv
OpenAlex
Not enriched
DOI
10.47989/ir31iconf64115
arXiv
2601.16513
Abstract
Introduction. AI Ethics is framed distinctly across actors and stakeholder groups. We report results from a case study of OpenAI analysing ethical AI discourse. Method. Research addressed: How has OpenAI's public discourse leveraged 'ethics', 'safety', 'alignment' and adjacent related concepts over time, and what does discourse signal about framing in practice? A structured corpus, differentiating between communication for a general audience and communication with an academic audience, was assembled from public documentation. Analysis. Qualitative content analysis of ethical themes combined inductively derived and deductively applied codes. Quantitative analysis leveraged computational content analysis methods via NLP to model topics and quantify changes in rhetoric over time. Visualizations report aggregate results. For reproducible results, we have released our code at https://github.com/famous-blue-raincoat/AI_Ethics_Discourse. Results. Results indicate that safety and risk discourse dominate OpenAI's public communication and documentation, without applying academic and advocacy ethics frameworks or vocabularies. Conclusions. Implications for governance are presented, along with discussion of ethics-washing practices in industry.
Collections
Add to collection
Paper intelligence
Analysis has not been completed yet.
No graph connections yet.
Sync citations or add papers to shared collections to build this network.
Knowledge graph
Citation network
Explore references, papers that cite this work and related papers in your Codex library.
References
0No references have been linked yet.
Cited by
0No saved paper is currently linked as citing this work.
Related papers
0Add papers to shared collections or enrich their topics to find related work.
Research workspace
Attach the paper PDF, extract its text, classify its contents and create semantic embeddings.
Paper resources
No PDF assets have been attached to this paper yet.